|
ROTC
REVISITED
By DR. NESTOR M. NISPEROS
Published in www.mb.com.ph on 6/14/2001
|
|
Like
the group of distinguished executives of several Manila institutions
of higher learning, I share the serious concern about the
Reserve Officers Training Corps (ROTC) program. But to abolish
the program in view of its perceived faults is not a solution
at all. With all due respect, it may even generate bigger
problems than the original-which the group notably views as
cancer.
Assuming for the moment the possibility of the serious malaise
carcinoma, medical scientists would agree that at the outset
rigorous and scientific diagnostics are in order. Naturally
this would rely on hard empirical evidence and set aside misleading
biases and false impressions.
What
is the real nature and character of the ROTC program at the
present? What are its problems? What are the causes and effects?
Why and how?
The
ROTC program exists and operates in the context of the education
and defense systems - both of which are important parts of
the larger system of national development and security policy.
This potentially synergistic relationship between education
and defense needs to be understood better, in view of the
systemic link between national development and national security,
a vital point relevant to a reformed and enhanced ROTC program.
There
is of course no denying the profound changes in ROTC over
time, including its many shortcomings which interestingly
are in many respects similar to other management systems in
the Philippine bureaucracy - of which ROTC is a subpart. They
must, however, be dealt with resolutely, addressed directly
and accurately, strengthening its management system and nourishing
its crucial goal of contributing to developing better citizens.
Several
points may be considered in any effort to reform and strengthen
the ROTC program:
-
Scientific inquiry into the ROTC management system (needless
to state including its environmental context) to ascertain
problem areas, particularly their causes and effects.
-
Review of the ROTC philosophy specially in the context of
new holistic understandings/theories of national development
and security (e.g., recent inquiries pursued in the AFP Joint
Command and Staff College, the NDCP Foundation; and the ISIP-Vanguard
Foundation).
-
Appointment of better prepared and suited cadres to manage
and train corps of cadets in campuses across subcultures nationwide.
-
As a discrete course required in a tertiary degree program,
ROTC needs to employ modern teaching-learning technologies
and while managed by military cadres (as faculty members)
must ultimately submit to the final authority of university
officials in the institutional hierarchy.
-
Malefactors in the program dealt with properly via the administrative
system, or the criminal justice system as the case may be.
Indeed
as the above mentioned group of academic elites rightly contend:
There must be a way to meet constitutional imperatives of
national defense and citizenship training. Already there is
abundant and helpful evidence on the correlation between education
and development. Perhaps we need only to inquire more into
development and security as mentioned earlier.
Significantly,
there seems to be an even more potent educational system that
effectively combines and mobilizes societys teachers, namely:
parents-classroom tutors- government officials-religious-mass
media working synergistically together to make good citizens
of societys members.
Against
this backdrop, it is evident what role a reformed ROTC program
may play in helping cultivate desirable qualities in the modern
Filipino: love of country and mindful of the public or national
interest; rational and disciplined; entrepreneurial and risk
taker, selfless and considerate of fellowmen, tenacious and
persevering in the pursuit of goals.
The
lament of the group of educational leaders is a critique not
on the ROTC program alone. It is a timely wake up call on
citizenship training and its outcomes-the development of our
youth in whose hands lie the future of the country.
Pending
a scientific inquiry into the nature and character of the
ROTC program, it may not be amiss to say that the programs
output and outcomes depend largely on the quality of its leaders,
specially program cadres and their superiors in the bureaucracy.
|