Free Web Site - Free Web Space and Site Hosting - Web Hosting - Internet Store and Ecommerce Solution Provider - High Speed Internet
Search the Web
Today on Adobo
 

Removing the ROT from ROTC

6/19/01

THEN AND NOW Manuel L. Quezon III

WHEN the Rector Magnificus of the Royal and Pontifical University of Santo Tomas speaks, people listen. And the head of Asia’s oldest university has come out strongly against continuing with the military training course for college students—the ROTC (Reserve Officers Training Corps).

What is striking about this declaration made in the wake of the tragic death of a UST student is that UST was one of the first institutions of learning to enthusiastically adopt the ROTC program when it was created before World War II. Along with the students of other colleges and universities, young men from UST unhesitatingly answered their country’s call to the colors in 1941 and fought and died in Bataan. But now UST has declared itself in favor of the abolition of the ROTC requirement, joining a chorus of protest emanating from many institutions, including the Manuel L. Quezon University.

The Armed Forces has reacted to the outcry with the sort of horror friars used to display when confronted with heresy. Impossible, the AFP says; the requirement for military training is in the Constitution. And besides, the National Defense Act is in place and has not been touched by any administration.

I have proposed many a time, and I propose again, that there is no incompatibility between the duty of a citizen to render national service and be on call for national defense, as mandated by the Constitution and the National Defense Act, and the need for reforms that will make the ROTC relevant, useful and a means for building character instead of instilling cruelty, crookedness and a callous attitude toward students.

The most basic reform is to eliminate the military training requirement at the high-school level (Citizens Army Training or CAT) and make ROTC optional on the collegiate level. We have to face the fact that not everyone is cut out to be either an officer or a plain soldier. Let those who want to be one or the other undertake military training, preparatory to either entering active service, or being placed in the AFP reserves.

As far as I know, the Americans have a similar program in which students electing to enter the ROTC are given loans, which they pay off by enlisting in the armed forces after college, or by being enrolled in the reserves or national guard, making them liable to be called to duty in an emergency.

If the State mandates the obligation of every citizen to render service to it—an obligation I do not question—it also has the corresponding duty to require service that is reasonable and which takes the realities of our economic and social life into account. Students and their parents spend a lot of money for uniforms and other accouterments of military training while the AFP, swamped with millions of students, can only give them the most basic and outdated training.

War and warfare—the very nature of military training and tactics—in the modern world calls for smaller, more cohesive, highly trained forces and not the big citizen armies that fought in World War II. It is in the interest of the AFP to weed out the students who have no inclination to render military service and concentrate its resources on those who, by temperament or desire, would make better soldiers and officers.

This is not to say, however, that the reforms I am suggesting should result in letting the vast majority of students who, I am sure, if given the chance, would decline to take up ROTC or any form of military training. Nothing like that.

A further reform is needed that would concentrate on civics and active participation in the bureaucratic and political life of the country. I know of cases where students taking up computer-related courses do their practicums in government offices. Why, then, should their practicums not be considered as being the equivalent of military service? They are often not paid at all; or if they are, they are given a measly allowance. And yet they help the government and themselves by working in offices that need manpower but which have to operate under tight budgets.

College students should be offered loans or scholarships in exchange for a definite commitment to rendering national service for a period of time after they finish school. Those taking education-related courses, for example, could be given loans and pay off their loans by teaching after they graduate; engineering students could be assigned to municipalities to help out; medical students and nurses could be assisted with their tuition and required to assist in government hospitals either during their period of residency or in an national emergency. College students could be trained and required to learn electoral laws and regulations and assist school- teachers during elections; statistics majors could be required to help during the national census, and so on and so forth.

I suspect that the resistance by the AFP to the demands that the ROTC requirement be scrapped stems from a legitimate skepticism about the motives of some of those calling for the abolition of the military service requirement. The duties and obligations of citizenship have been spelled out and recognized since 1935, and there is no compelling reason to let the current generation of students off the hook. But for the AFP to dig in its heels is for it to stick its head in the sand and ignore equally legitimate criticisms of the abuses and futility of military service requirements as they exist at present.

It all boils down to everyone agreeing on one thing: that citizenship must entail service; but that service must be of the useful kind, when rendered. And that there are many, equally important ways to render service and, in turn, build the character of young men and women.

As always I may be reached at mlq3@info.com.ph. Reactions are always welcome.

PRINT | EMAIL TO A FRIEND
COMMENTS
Your name:
Your email:
Your location:
Email text: For better formatting, press 'Enter' only for new paragraphs. The text wraps around automatically in the field below.

 FRONTPAGE

Soldiers fight bandits with poor morale, gear
De Venecia, Abad in crucial meeting
COA scores DOH for missing record on P100-M donation

 METRO

De Castro acquitted in libel complaint
Asistio, priest took same flight to HK–BI
NHA asks Atienza to stop dumping of garbage at ‘SM’

 NATION

Workers appeased by DAR decision
Lina opposes plan to arm civilians in Basilan, Sulu
Serious papers don’t appeal to Ecijanos

 WORLD

Bush to meet Sharon anew but not Arafat
US govt puts Garza to death
Protesters defeating US Navy in Vieques

 BUSINESS

DTI bats for review of tariff structure
Equitable pays half of P30-B loan
Japan’s May trade surplus falls sharply as imports rise

 SPORTS

Welcoat sets the table for the clincher
Is Kobe coming back to Manila?
Wimbledon goes ‘seed-friendly’

 OPINION

Supper with the poor
Morato: I didn’t file a postelection statement of contributions and expenditures; why should I?
‘Creative destruction’ and the Web

 SHOW & STYLE

REALIZING ROBIN
THE BEN + MATT EQUATION THERE
Eat and live healthy with Omega-3-rich foods

ABOUT US | CONTACT US | FEEDBACK

Reproduction of any articles from TODAY on the Net in whole or in part without written permission is strictly prohibited.
Copyright © 2001 TODAY. All Rights Reserved.
An Adobo Alliance Site, designed and maintained by Adobo Interactive, Inc.